The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market

Stigler, G. J. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 59(3), 185-193.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1951

Volume

59

Issue

3

Pages

185-193

DOI

10.1086/257075

DOI registrant

University of Chicago Press

Link

https://doi.org/10.1086/257075

Cited from

economics_finance

Cited by

3 citations across 3 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Division of Labor
  • Once analysts have the partition-and-assignment language in view, they can stop asking "why isn't this worker doing more?" and start asking "is this activity decomposable in a way that recomposes cleanly, and is the coordination overhead worth the specialization gain?" — questions Stigler (1951) makes precise in his classic analysis of how the division of labor is limited by the extent of the market.
• Economies of Scale
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Specialization
  • Stigler (1951) sharpened this when he tied the extent of specialization to the size of the market — division of labor can only proceed as far as there is enough throughput to keep each narrowed unit fully employed — which is itself a substrate-neutral statement about when narrowing pays.

    This sourceTreats the firm-boundary location as a structural consequence of market extent governing the gain–coordination-cost balance.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:9dcd80979eef · see in the full table