A Theory-Based Instrument to Evaluate Team Communication in the Operating Room

Lingard, L., Regehr, G., Espin, S., & Whyte, S. (2006). A Theory-Based Instrument to Evaluate Team Communication in the Operating Room: Balancing Measurement Authenticity and Reliability. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(6), 422-426.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2006

Volume

15

Issue

6

Pages

422-426

DOI

10.1136/qshc.2005.015180

DOI registrant

BMJ

Link

https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.015180

Cited from

linguistics_semiotics

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Communication Repair
  • Aviation's closed-loop "read-back / confirm-or-correct" phraseology was imported into operating-room communication precisely because both share the high-stakes, noisy-channel profile.

    This sourceDocuments recurrent operating-room communication failures and motivates structured check/confirm communication; part of the body of work importing aviation-style closed-loop read-back/confirm into the operating room.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:9dde433d18ab · see in the full table