Attachment Stability From Infancy to Adulthood¶
Fraley, C. (2002). Attachment Stability From Infancy to Adulthood: Meta-Analysis and Dynamic Modeling of Developmental Mechanisms.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Attachment
- Individual differences in the functioning of the system are classified by Ainsworth's Strange Situation Procedure into attachment styles — secure (confident exploration, effective reunion), insecure-avoidant (suppressed proximity-seeking, apparent self-sufficiency under distress), insecure-ambivalent (heightened distress, inconsistent regulation), and disorganized (breakdown of coherent proximity strategy, associated with frightening caregiving) — and these patterns show predictable continuity into adult romantic relationships, therapeutic alliances, grief responses, and psychopathology
This sourceA meta-analysis finding attachment security only moderately stable across the first 19 years of life, best accounted for by prototype dynamics.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“Results indicate that attachment security is moderately stable across the first 19 years of life”
- Individual differences in the functioning of the system are classified by Ainsworth's Strange Situation Procedure into attachment styles — secure (confident exploration, effective reunion), insecure-avoidant (suppressed proximity-seeking, apparent self-sufficiency under distress), insecure-ambivalent (heightened distress, inconsistent regulation), and disorganized (breakdown of coherent proximity strategy, associated with frightening caregiving) — and these patterns show predictable continuity into adult romantic relationships, therapeutic alliances, grief responses, and psychopathology
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:9e29ae267cc6 · see in the full table