Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes¶
Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, Claxton, Stoddart, & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Commensurability
- Cost-benefit analysis uses dollars as the common measure; cost-effectiveness analysis uses quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for health outcomes; multi-criteria decision analysis constructs weighted utility scales, as Drummond et al. (2015) catalogue across the standard methods of economic evaluation.
This sourceCatalogues cost-benefit analysis (dollars), cost-effectiveness analysis (cost per outcome), cost-utility analysis (QALYs/DALYs), and multi-criteria methods as alternative commensuration schemes; supports the decision-analysis broad-use claim.
- Cost-benefit analysis uses dollars as the common measure; cost-effectiveness analysis uses quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for health outcomes; multi-criteria decision analysis constructs weighted utility scales, as Drummond et al. (2015) catalogue across the standard methods of economic evaluation.
- Value Commensuration
- Does this framework marginalize people with disabilities by implicitly devaluing their lived experience?
This sourceStandard health-economics textbook: catalogues cost-benefit analysis (dollars), cost-effectiveness analysis (cost per outcome), cost-utility analysis (QALYs/DALYs), and multi-criteria methods as alternative commensuration schemes.
- Does this framework marginalize people with disabilities by implicitly devaluing their lived experience?
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's ISBN resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:9f5b6c42df2d · see in the full table