Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes¶
Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, Claxton, Stoddart, & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Commensurability
- Cost-benefit analysis uses dollars as the common measure; cost-effectiveness analysis uses quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for health outcomes; multi-criteria decision analysis constructs weighted utility scales, as Drummond et al. (2015) catalogue across the standard methods of economic evaluation.
This sourceCatalogues cost-benefit analysis (dollars), cost-effectiveness analysis (cost per outcome), cost-utility analysis (QALYs/DALYs), and multi-criteria methods as alternative commensuration schemes; supports the decision-analysis broad-use claim.
- Cost-benefit analysis uses dollars as the common measure; cost-effectiveness analysis uses quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for health outcomes; multi-criteria decision analysis constructs weighted utility scales, as Drummond et al. (2015) catalogue across the standard methods of economic evaluation.
- Value Commensuration
- Does this framework marginalize people with disabilities by implicitly devaluing their lived experience?
This sourceStandard health-economics textbook: catalogues cost-benefit analysis (dollars), cost-effectiveness analysis (cost per outcome), cost-utility analysis (QALYs/DALYs), and multi-criteria methods as alternative commensuration schemes.
- Does this framework marginalize people with disabilities by implicitly devaluing their lived experience?
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:9f5b6c42df2d · see in the full table