Arriving at an Anti-Forensics Consensus¶
Harris, R. (2006). Arriving at an Anti-Forensics Consensus: Examining How to Define and Control the Anti-Forensics Problem. Digital Investigation.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Spoofing & Counter-Forensic Challenge
- Where incidental marks are copyable, this is the only step that finds out before the adversary does; counter-forensics is a real and active field, not a hypothetical.
This sourceDefines anti-forensics and catalogs techniques for destroying, hiding, eliminating, or counterfeiting digital evidence.
- Where incidental marks are copyable, this is the only step that finds out before the adversary does; counter-forensics is a real and active field, not a hypothetical.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a010b3d6d990 · see in the full table