The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods¶
Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996). The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Free Riding
- Tax evasion, undersupply of public education, underfunding of national defense, and the problem of pharmaceutical innovation (high R&D cost, easy generic replication) all instantiate free-riding incentives, a domain Cornes and Sandler (1996) survey systematically across pure, impure, and club goods.
This sourceSystematic treatment of pure, impure, and club goods covering tax compliance, defense, education, and R&D underprovision; supports the broad-use survey claim across public-goods instances.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Confirms the book is a theoretical treatment of externalities, public goods, and club goods, but never names free riding, tax evasion, education, defense, or pharmaceutical R&D, so it backs the survey frame only.
“This book presents a theoretical treatment of externalities (i.e. uncompensated interdependencies), public goods, and club goods.”
- Tax evasion, undersupply of public education, underfunding of national defense, and the problem of pharmaceutical innovation (high R&D cost, easy generic replication) all instantiate free-riding incentives, a domain Cornes and Sandler (1996) survey systematically across pure, impure, and club goods.
- Public Goods
This sourceComprehensive treatment of free-riding in pure public goods, impure public goods, and club goods; covers tax compliance, defense, education, and R&D as canonical instances of underprovision.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a02019e8f564 · see in the full table