Guinn v. United States¶
Supreme Court of the United States. (1915). Guinn v. United States.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Membership Criteria Update
- Its transition scaffolding is where the honest version lives — a grandfather clause is the familiar tool for it, and worth remembering that the term itself is a caution: it entered use to preserve an exclusion across a rule change, which is exactly the misuse to guard against.
This sourceDocuments a grandfather clause that preserved pre-1866 voting eligibility and thereby sustained racial exclusion under a new literacy-test rule.
- Its transition scaffolding is where the honest version lives — a grandfather clause is the familiar tool for it, and worth remembering that the term itself is a caution: it entered use to preserve an exclusion across a rule change, which is exactly the misuse to guard against.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a02c81661d3e · see in the full table