Seroprevalence of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in 10 Sites in the United States, March 23-May 12, 2020¶
Havers, F. P., Reed, C., Lim, T., Montgomery, J. M., Klena, J. D., Hall, A. J., Fry, A. M., et al. (2020). Seroprevalence of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in 10 Sites in the United States, March 23-May 12, 2020. JAMA Internal Medicine.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Outbreak Underascertainment
- A CDC-led study of residual clinical blood specimens across ten U.S. sites (Havers et al., JAMA Internal Medicine, 2020) estimated that the number of people with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies exceeded reported cases by roughly 6- to 24-fold, the multiplier varying by site and period with local testing intensity
This sourceHavers et al. is the study the sentence names: residual specimens from 16,025 people at ten US sites, March-May 2020, with adjusted seroprevalence from 1.0% (San Francisco Bay) to 6.9% (New York City) and infections exceeding reported cases by 6- to 24-fold, seven sites above tenfold - a single estimate per site rather than a within-site trend.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- A CDC-led study of residual clinical blood specimens across ten U.S. sites (Havers et al., JAMA Internal Medicine, 2020) estimated that the number of people with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies exceeded reported cases by roughly 6- to 24-fold, the multiplier varying by site and period with local testing intensity
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a11b5018f54f · see in the full table