Monopoly and Product Quality.¶
Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and Product Quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2), 301-317.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Price Discrimination
- Formally, second-degree discrimination is a mechanism-design problem: the seller designs a menu \(\{(q_i, t_i)\}\) of quality-payment pairs such that each buyer-type prefers their designated pair to any other pair, subject to individual rationality — the classical Screening problem (Mussa-Rosen 1978 for quality-differentiated goods, Maskin-Riley 1984 for quantity-differentiated goods).
This sourceContinuous-type screening with quality-differentiated goods; introduced ironing and bunching techniques that became standard for second-degree price discrimination.
- Formally, second-degree discrimination is a mechanism-design problem: the seller designs a menu \(\{(q_i, t_i)\}\) of quality-payment pairs such that each buyer-type prefers their designated pair to any other pair, subject to individual rationality — the classical Screening problem (Mussa-Rosen 1978 for quality-differentiated goods, Maskin-Riley 1984 for quantity-differentiated goods).
- Screening
- T1: Revelation Power vs Downward Distortion Cost.
This sourceContinuous-type screening with quality-differentiated goods; introduced ironing and bunching techniques that became standard for second-degree price discrimination.
- T1: Revelation Power vs Downward Distortion Cost.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a14a919db778 · see in the full table