Ramos v. Louisiana¶
(2020). Ramos v. Louisiana.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Consensus
- The fault model is the possibility that some jurors are biased, inattentive, or acting in bad faith, and the threshold is encoded in the decision rule — a unanimity requirement tolerates zero "faulty" deciders for a conviction, which is a deliberate, very conservative fault threshold.
This sourceThe U.S. Supreme Court holds the Sixth Amendment requires a unanimous jury verdict to convict in state criminal trials — a deliberate, maximally conservative fault-threshold (zero tolerated dissenters), making the hung jury the social form of an agreement-versus-termination tension.
- The fault model is the possibility that some jurors are biased, inattentive, or acting in bad faith, and the threshold is encoded in the decision rule — a unanimity requirement tolerates zero "faulty" deciders for a conviction, which is a deliberate, very conservative fault threshold.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a155d6136133 · see in the full table