National Science Education Standards¶
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academies Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Inquiry-Based Learning
- Structurally, inquiry-based instruction involves: anchor phenomenon or driving-question selection; elicitation and activation of prior knowledge (preconceptions, relevant background, what learners wonder about); investigation planning (what evidence is needed, how to gather it); investigation execution (with scaffolds for data-collection, observation, experimentation, source analysis, modeling, depending on the discipline); analysis and interpretation; explanation construction and argumentation from evidence; peer critique and revision; and iteration as new questions emerge — the canonical sequence the National Research Council (1996) codified in the National Science Education Standards.
This sourceCodifies the canonical inquiry sequence — question, investigation, evidence, explanation, argumentation, revision — as the structural backbone of K-12 science education in the United States.
- Structurally, inquiry-based instruction involves: anchor phenomenon or driving-question selection; elicitation and activation of prior knowledge (preconceptions, relevant background, what learners wonder about); investigation planning (what evidence is needed, how to gather it); investigation execution (with scaffolds for data-collection, observation, experimentation, source analysis, modeling, depending on the discipline); analysis and interpretation; explanation construction and argumentation from evidence; peer critique and revision; and iteration as new questions emerge — the canonical sequence the National Research Council (1996) codified in the National Science Education Standards.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a178a024becd · see in the full table