The Correspondence Bias¶
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The Correspondence Bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21-38.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Fundamental Attribution Error
- Gilbert and colleagues' research on cognitive load (Gilbert, Pelham, & Krull 1988) demonstrated that correspondence inference is an effortful correction process, suggesting that the bias may arise partly from insufficient cognitive resources to fully discount situational causes.
This sourceReframes FAE as correspondence bias; sketches its intellectual history and describes four mechanisms (lack of awareness, unrealistic expectations, inflated categorizations, incomplete corrections), centering the effortful-correction account.
- Gilbert and colleagues' research on cognitive load (Gilbert, Pelham, & Krull 1988) demonstrated that correspondence inference is an effortful correction process, suggesting that the bias may arise partly from insufficient cognitive resources to fully discount situational causes.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a2577ea7cf14 · see in the full table