ISO/IEC 17000:2020 — Conformity assessment — Vocabulary and general principles¶
ISO/IEC. (2020). ISO/IEC 17000:2020 — Conformity assessment — Vocabulary and general principles.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Journalistic Objectivity
- Institutional review and ombuds work. Review boards, ethics committees, ombudspersons, and inspectors general designed to investigate within institutions while insulated from the line authority that would benefit from a favorable finding. Standards, certification, and elections. Third-party certifiers deriving licence from independence of producers and consumers; election commissions and outside observers brought in precisely because they are external to the contest.
This sourceDefines third-party conformity assessment as performed by a body independent of the provider and of user interests, and codifies impartiality/independence as requirements — the structural basis on which certification bodies derive licence.
- Institutional review and ombuds work. Review boards, ethics committees, ombudspersons, and inspectors general designed to investigate within institutions while insulated from the line authority that would benefit from a favorable finding. Standards, certification, and elections. Third-party certifiers deriving licence from independence of producers and consumers; election commissions and outside observers brought in precisely because they are external to the contest.
Mechanisms¶
- Certification Regime
- Its failure mode is paper compliance against a stale or narrow standard: a certificate attests conformity to a defined scope and standard, not fitness for every real use, and the gap between "conforms to the standard" and "safe in this deployment" is exactly where certification misleads.
This sourceISO. (2020). Defines certification as third-party attestation against specified requirements within an identified scope, rather than an assurance of fitness for every possible use.
- Its failure mode is paper compliance against a stale or narrow standard: a certificate attests conformity to a defined scope and standard, not fitness for every real use, and the gap between "conforms to the standard" and "safe in this deployment" is exactly where certification misleads.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a3e8ca2e268f · see in the full table