Snakemake—A Scalable Bioinformatics Workflow Engine¶
Köster, J., & Rahmann, S. (2012). Snakemake—A Scalable Bioinformatics Workflow Engine. Bioinformatics, 28(19), 2520-2522.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Workflow Script or Pipeline
- Its strength is collapsing the distance between the documented method and the executed one: an automated pipeline cannot skip a step a tired human would, and every run of it is observable and comparable.
This sourceSnakemake joins a readable workflow definition to an execution engine, helping automate and reproduce declared computational pipelines.
- Its strength is collapsing the distance between the documented method and the executed one: an automated pipeline cannot skip a step a tired human would, and every run of it is observable and comparable.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a42b5a0c7e89 · see in the full table