Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior¶
Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. Mouton.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Emic And Etic
- In anthropology, the origin substrate via Kenneth Pike's extension of phonemics and phonetics, cultural categories of kinship, taboo, or honour are described in insiders' own terms and in the analyst's comparative typology, and most ethnography is the act of moving between the two.
This sourceCoins emic/etic by analogy to phonemic/phonetic — the insider (participant-recognizable) versus outsider (analyst-reproducible) descriptive standpoints.
- In anthropology, the origin substrate via Kenneth Pike's extension of phonemics and phonetics, cultural categories of kinship, taboo, or honour are described in insiders' own terms and in the analyst's comparative typology, and most ethnography is the act of moving between the two.
Mechanisms¶
- Codebook Loss Note
- It operationalizes the emic/etic distinction — the difference between meaning in the participants' own terms and meaning in the analyst's external framework — by refusing to let the etic code erase the emic source silently.
This sourceDistinguishes an emic account grounded in categories meaningful within the studied system from an etic analysis using criteria external to that system.
- It operationalizes the emic/etic distinction — the difference between meaning in the participants' own terms and meaning in the analyst's external framework — by refusing to let the etic code erase the emic source silently.
- Emic Context Interview
- The emic/etic distinction is the anchor: the method's whole value is that it reports the emic account and does not quietly collapse it into the analyst's etic one.
This sourceIntroduces the emic/etic distinction as participant-internal versus analyst-external standpoints for describing behavior.
- The emic/etic distinction is the anchor: the method's whole value is that it reports the emic account and does not quietly collapse it into the analyst's etic one.
- Etic/Emic Contrast Matrix
- The emic/etic split it enforces is Kenneth Pike's — the difference between describing behavior in an outside, comparative vocabulary and describing it in the categories the participants themselves use.
This sourceDistinguishes an external comparative etic description from an emic description organized by categories meaningful to participants.
- The emic/etic split it enforces is Kenneth Pike's — the difference between describing behavior in an outside, comparative vocabulary and describing it in the categories the participants themselves use.
- Identity-Field Interview
- Its strength is that it grounds the whole design in an emic account — the categories the audience actually uses
This sourceDefines an emic account through distinctions that function within the community’s own behavioral system.
- Its strength is that it grounds the whole design in an emic account — the categories the audience actually uses
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.
- https://archive.org/details/languageinrelati0000pike ×1
- https://search.worldcat.org/es/title/Language-in-relation-to-a-unified-theory-of-the-structure-of-human-behavior/oclc/308042 ×1
Registry ID ref:a501a34d9676 · see in the full table