1995 CIA disinformation controversy¶
(2026). 1995 CIA disinformation controversy.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Deception Blowback
- In intelligence and counterintelligence, a planted source produces material the originating agency later cites in its own assessments, the canonical self-poisoning pathology of large bureaus.
This sourceDocuments how the CIA's SE Division, knowing or suspecting sources to be Soviet/Russian-controlled double agents, disseminated their 'feed' material within the government from 1986–1994 — with 95 such reports reaching senior officials and several reaching Presidents Reagan, Bush, and Clinton — the canonical self-poisoning blowback of unsegregated planted intelligence re-entering the originating apparatus's own reporting.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Documents CIA divisions disseminating suspected double-agent "feed" into government reporting, which altered analyses; does not call it a canonical pattern or cover bureaus generally.
“Although the CIA's Soviet-East European (SE) and Central Eurasian divisions knew or suspected the sources to be Soviet double agents, they nevertheless disseminated this "feed" material within the government.”
- In intelligence and counterintelligence, a planted source produces material the originating agency later cites in its own assessments, the canonical self-poisoning pathology of large bureaus.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a60aede6ee7e · see in the full table