Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature¶
Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cultural Friction
- Friction is not a temporary condition pending adaptation; it is a structural incompatibility requiring negotiation, in contrast to the temporal-lag framing Ogburn (1922) proposed in his theory of culture lag, which assumed eventual normative catch-up to material change.
This sourceB. W. Huebsch. Original coinage of 'cultural lag': distinguishes faster-changing material culture from slower-changing non-material culture (norms, beliefs, values) and assumes eventual normative catch-up, the temporal-lag framing the prime contrasts against persistent friction.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Ogburn's 1922 text supports his temporal-lag framing (adjustment follows after a delay, a finite period of maladjustment), not the entry's own friction thesis.
“there frequently is a delay in the changes occasioned in the dependent part”
- Friction is not a temporary condition pending adaptation; it is a structural incompatibility requiring negotiation, in contrast to the temporal-lag framing Ogburn (1922) proposed in his theory of culture lag, which assumed eventual normative catch-up to material change.
- Culture Lag
- Culture lag is Ogburn's formalization of a recurring structural pattern in which a society's components (technologies, institutions, laws, norms, beliefs, values) change at different rates, creating a temporal maladjustment when faster-changing components outpace slower-changing dependent components
This sourceCoins 'cultural lag'; distinguishes faster-changing material culture from slower-changing non-material culture (norms, laws, beliefs).
SupportedVerified against the work's full text
Ogburn states his thesis that interdependent parts of culture change at unequal rates, so dependent parts lag behind material change and produce a period of maladjustment.
“The thesis is that the various parts of modern culture are not changing at the same rate, some parts are changing much more rapidly than others; and that since there is a correlation and interdependence of parts, a rapid change in one part of our culture requires readjustments”
- Culture lag is Ogburn's formalization of a recurring structural pattern in which a society's components (technologies, institutions, laws, norms, beliefs, values) change at different rates, creating a temporal maladjustment when faster-changing components outpace slower-changing dependent components
- Institutional Lag
- Culture Lag (similarity 0.733), originally coined by Ogburn (1922), emphasizes informal norms, beliefs, and values lagging behind faster-changing technology or material conditions.
This sourceB. W. Huebsch. Original coinage of the "cultural lag" concept: distinguishes faster-changing material culture from slower-changing non-material culture (norms, beliefs, values), establishing the conceptual neighbor against which Institutional Lag is contrasted.
SupportedVerified against the work's full text
Ogburn's book advances the hypothesis of cultural lag: customs, beliefs, mores and other adaptive culture change more slowly than material culture, producing maladjustment.
“These material-culture changes force changes In other parts of culture such as social organization and customs, but these latter parts of culture do not change as quickly. They lag behind the material-culture changes”
- Culture Lag (similarity 0.733), originally coined by Ogburn (1922), emphasizes informal norms, beliefs, and values lagging behind faster-changing technology or material conditions.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 3 of 3 citations: 2 supported, 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:a66894fd488c · see in the full table