Joint Publication 5-0: Joint Planning¶
United States Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2017). Joint Publication 5-0: Joint Planning: Joint Planning.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Operational Period
- Military doctrine: campaigns sequenced into phases, each with phase-specific objectives, force allocation, and end-state criteria, with phase transitions as explicit reassessment moments.
This sourceDescribes phasing of operations into discrete phases with phase objectives, end states, and transitions (reassessment points) between phases.
- Military doctrine: campaigns sequenced into phases, each with phase-specific objectives, force allocation, and end-state criteria, with phase transitions as explicit reassessment moments.
Domain-specific¶
- Operational Design
- Codified in JP 5-0 and ADRP 5-0, it supplies the conceptual framing that the joint planning process (the joint operation planning process, JOPP, in the 2011 edition of JP 5-0; the joint planning process, JPP, from the 2017 edition) then converts into a detailed plan, precisely because plans generated without grounded problem understanding tend to address only the symptoms of the problem — solving the wrong problem with high precision
This sourceJP 5-0 is the joint half of the codification: operational design 'provides the conceptual basis for structuring campaigns and operations' - understand the environment, separate symptoms from root causes, develop the operational approach - which the planning process then converts into a detailed plan, and doctrine's own warning is that inadequate problem definition leaves the planning task addressing 'only symptoms of the problem'; the process is JOPP in the 2011 edition and JPP from 2017, as the sentence now says, while ADRP 5-0 is the separate Army publication.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Codified in JP 5-0 and ADRP 5-0, it supplies the conceptual framing that the joint planning process (the joint operation planning process, JOPP, in the 2011 edition of JP 5-0; the joint planning process, JPP, from the 2017 edition) then converts into a detailed plan, precisely because plans generated without grounded problem understanding tend to address only the symptoms of the problem — solving the wrong problem with high precision
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a7affb30c22a · see in the full table