Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception¶
Rogers, R. (2018). Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception. Guilford Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Validity Scale
- A cutoff optimized in an instructed-feigning study may perform differently in a clinical population containing genuine severe symptoms
This sourceThe handbook's chapters on detection strategies and on researching response styles set out the simulation versus known-groups design distinction from which this caution follows; the slot is better pointed at Rogers's chapter than at the whole edited volume.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- A cutoff optimized in an instructed-feigning study may perform differently in a clinical population containing genuine severe symptoms
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a7ea7f070786 · see in the full table