Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking¶
Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices. Springer.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Concept Drift
- And in standardised testing, item difficulty and cut scores drift, requiring periodic re-equating to keep results comparable across years.
This sourceStandard reference on equating to keep standardized-test scores comparable across forms and years as item difficulty and cut scores drift.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract states equating keeps scores from multiple standardised test forms interchangeable, but says nothing about item difficulty or cut scores drifting across years.
“Test equating methods are used with many standardized tests in education and psychology to ensure that scores from multiple test forms can be used interchangeably.”
- And in standardised testing, item difficulty and cut scores drift, requiring periodic re-equating to keep results comparable across years.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a8867e7f1d03 · see in the full table