Shaping Written Knowledge¶
Bazerman. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. University of Wisconsin Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Genre
- Scientific writing instantiates the same mechanism: the IMRaD structure is the genre contract of an empirical paper, and transgressing it carries social consequences regardless of a paper's substantive quality
This sourceBazerman traces the changing form of the experimental article and its impact on the social structure of the scientific community.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“zation of [scientific] communication in journals had impact on the social structure of the [scientific] community”
- Scientific writing instantiates the same mechanism: the IMRaD structure is the genre contract of an empirical paper, and transgressing it carries social consequences regardless of a paper's substantive quality
- Logos
- Forensic and judicial rhetoric — the origin, where legal argument presents itself as statutes, precedents, inferential chains, and conclusion, its prestige grounded in the appearance of reasoned demonstration. Scientific and technical writing — methods, statistics, and derivations mobilising the logos register even when the epistemic warrant actually comes from replication or paradigm fit
This sourceBazerman's study of the experimental article, whose chapters on APA style and on theory in physics reports show methods sections, statistics and equations doing rhetorical work independent of the substance they report; the replication clause is not his argument.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Forensic and judicial rhetoric — the origin, where legal argument presents itself as statutes, precedents, inferential chains, and conclusion, its prestige grounded in the appearance of reasoned demonstration. Scientific and technical writing — methods, statistics, and derivations mobilising the logos register even when the epistemic warrant actually comes from replication or paradigm fit
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:a9a14fe55f8a · see in the full table