Integral Logistic Structures¶
Hoekstra, S., & Romme, J. (1992). Integral Logistic Structures: Developing Customer-Oriented Goods Flow. McGraw-Hill.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Decoupling Point
- In logistics and supply chain, the origin substrate, the position of the decoupling point distinguishes make-to-stock (decoupling at finished goods), assemble-to-order (decoupling at components), make-to-order (decoupling at raw materials), and engineer-to-order (decoupling further upstream); the Customer Order Decoupling Point literature names it explicitly.
This sourceIntroduces and develops the Customer Order Decoupling Point and the make-to-stock / assemble-to-order / make-to-order / engineer-to-order spectrum, with the position of the decoupling point as a strategic variable that separates forecast-driven from order-driven activity and determines stock placement and risk.
- In logistics and supply chain, the origin substrate, the position of the decoupling point distinguishes make-to-stock (decoupling at finished goods), assemble-to-order (decoupling at components), make-to-order (decoupling at raw materials), and engineer-to-order (decoupling further upstream); the Customer Order Decoupling Point literature names it explicitly.
- Pull Flow
- The decoupling point logic also transfers: a build-to-order manufacturer pushes generic components to a stocking point on forecast, then pulls final assembly from the customer order — and a cloud system may pre-warm a pool of instances (push) that requests then pull from, the warm-pool boundary being exactly the engineered decoupling point.
This sourceIntroduces the customer-order decoupling point (order-penetration point), the boundary where forecast-driven push upstream becomes order-driven pull downstream in a build-to-order chain.
- The decoupling point logic also transfers: a build-to-order manufacturer pushes generic components to a stocking point on forecast, then pulls final assembly from the customer order — and a cloud system may pre-warm a pool of instances (push) that requests then pull from, the warm-pool boundary being exactly the engineered decoupling point.
Domain-specific¶
- Make-to-Order
- Assemble-to-order, configure-to-order, and engineer-to-order are other placements of the same point; MTO is not the spectrum but the far-upstream production configuration on it, short of ETO.
This sourceHoekstra and Romme's decoupling-point ladder, which places assemble-to-order at DP3, make-to-order at DP4 (only raw materials and components converted after the order), and a purchase-and-make-to-order rung at DP5.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Assemble-to-order, configure-to-order, and engineer-to-order are other placements of the same point; MTO is not the spectrum but the far-upstream production configuration on it, short of ETO.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 3 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.
- https://search.worldcat.org/title/Integral-logistic-structures-:-developing-customer-oriented-goods-flow/oclc/26397939 ×1
- https://search.worldcat.org/title/integral-logistic-structures-developing-customer-oriented-goods-flow/oclc/924931499 ×1
Registry ID ref:a9b007a51928 · see in the full table