Probability vs. non-probability sampling in survey research¶
Schäffer, C. M., Schoenbachler, & Heuvelink, E. V. (2018). Probability vs. non-probability sampling in survey research: A meta-analysis. Quality Assurance Journal, 21(2), 87-105.
Retired. The audit could not find this work in any authority, and where a publisher, journal or conference had its own catalogue the work was absent from it. It appears never to have been published. This entry is kept so the citations that pointed at it still resolve, and so the correction is visible rather than silent.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Sampling (Representativeness)
- The survey's total cost is approximately $380,000 — a substantial investment relative to a convenience-sample alternative that would have been perhaps one-fifth the cost but would not have supported defensible prevalence estimation
This sourceSchaffer probability non-probability sampling methodological comparison meta-analysis.
- The survey's total cost is approximately $380,000 — a substantial investment relative to a convenience-sample alternative that would have been perhaps one-fifth the cost but would not have supported defensible prevalence estimation
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:aa226a734993 · see in the full table