Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature¶
Green, R. E., Cornell, S. J., Scharlemann, J. P. W., & Balmford, A. (2005). Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature. Science, 307(5709), 550-555.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Internal Intensification
- the land-sparing-versus-land-sharing agricultural debate moved from conservation biology into climate-policy land-use accounting.
This sourceFrames the land-sparing-versus-land-sharing debate (yield intensification on existing farmland versus expansion to new land), later carried into climate-policy land-use accounting.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract frames the land-sparing versus wildlife-friendly farming debate, but says nothing about its migration into climate-policy land-use accounting.
“Two competing solutions have been proposed: wildlife-friendly farming (which boosts densities of wild populations on farmland but may decrease agricultural yields) and land sparing (which minimizes demand for farmland by increasing yield).”
- the land-sparing-versus-land-sharing agricultural debate moved from conservation biology into climate-policy land-use accounting.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ab602f15c161 · see in the full table