Enhancing the Explanatory Power of Usability Heuristics¶
Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the Explanatory Power of Usability Heuristics. ACM, 152-158.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Empty State Design
- A user facing an uncontextualized blank cannot tell whether the container is legitimately empty, still loading, or failing — and tends to assume the worst, concluding the feature is broken or hunting for content that does not exist
This sourceNielsen's revised usability heuristics, including visibility of system status, the general principle that an interface should show users what state it is in.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- A user facing an uncontextualized blank cannot tell whether the container is legitimately empty, still loading, or failing — and tends to assume the worst, concluding the feature is broken or hunting for content that does not exist
- Error-Message Opacity
- The reference standard that exposes the defect is Jakob Nielsen's ninth usability heuristic, "Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors," which prescribes that a good error message be expressed in plain language, precisely indicate the problem, and constructively suggest a solution
This sourceThe paper from which Nielsen's refined ten usability heuristics derive, including the error heuristic that asks for messages in plain language that pinpoint the problem and suggest a fix; the ordinal position comes from the canonical numbering of that list.
SupportedVerified against the source
- The reference standard that exposes the defect is Jakob Nielsen's ninth usability heuristic, "Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors," which prescribes that a good error message be expressed in plain language, precisely indicate the problem, and constructively suggest a solution
Mechanisms¶
- Undo or Cancel Flow
- The discipline that guards against this is to bind the control to genuine recoverability
This sourceIncludes genuine undo and recovery support within the user-control-and-freedom heuristic.
- The discipline that guards against this is to bind the control to genuine recoverability
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 3 citations: 1 supported, 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ab69efa44f46 · see in the full table