EN 301 549 V3.2.1: Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services¶
ETSI, C., & CENELEC. (2021). EN 301 549 V3.2.1: Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services: Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services. CEN, CENELEC and ETSI.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Perceivable Design
- Within HCI practice the principle governs conformance audits (do all images have alt text? do videos have captions? does the contrast ratio meet threshold?), design-system requirements, and procurement standards encoded in Section 508, EN 301 549, and equivalent regulatory frameworks
This sourceEN 301 549, the harmonised European ICT-accessibility standard for public procurement, which carries WCAG 2.1's Perceivable requirements in its clause 9.1.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Within HCI practice the principle governs conformance audits (do all images have alt text? do videos have captions? does the contrast ratio meet threshold?), design-system requirements, and procurement standards encoded in Section 508, EN 301 549, and equivalent regulatory frameworks
- Robust Accessibility
- Web content accessibility (WCAG, origin). The home turf: Principle 4 and its conformance criteria (programmatically determinable name, role, value; status messages) govern conformance audits, design-system requirements, and procurement standards for authored web content.
This sourceThat WCAG conformance is the technical yardstick governing accessibility audits and public-procurement requirements for authored web content.
- Web content accessibility (WCAG, origin). The home turf: Principle 4 and its conformance criteria (programmatically determinable name, role, value; status messages) govern conformance audits, design-system requirements, and procurement standards for authored web content.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ac507071d4b8 · see in the full table