Rethinking length-based fisheries regulations¶
Gwinn, D. C., Allen, M. S., Johnston, F. D., Brown, P., Todd, C. R., & Arlinghaus, R. (2015). Rethinking length-based fisheries regulations: the value of protecting old and large fish with harvest slots. Fish and Fisheries, 16(2), 259-281.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Selectivity Window
- In conservation and pest management, size- and age-selective harvest windows discriminate individual classes only inside a band, and application windows discriminate pest from beneficial organism only at the right phenological stage.
This sourceAnalyzes harvest slot limits — a bounded size range within which fish may be taken, releasing those below and above — discriminating harvestable from protected classes only inside a band.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract states harvest slots restrict take to intermediate lengths (ages) — a bounded band — for fish; it says nothing about pest management or phenological application windows.
“Harvest‐slot‐length limits (harvest slots) restrict harvest to intermediate lengths (ages), which may contribute to maintaining high harvest numbers and a more natural age‐structure.”
- In conservation and pest management, size- and age-selective harvest windows discriminate individual classes only inside a band, and application windows discriminate pest from beneficial organism only at the right phenological stage.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:aca36e91c5b5 · see in the full table