Ohio v. American Express Co.¶
Supreme Court of the United States. (2018). Ohio v. American Express Co.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Two Sided Market
- The pattern ports further within its domain. Platform-competition analysis into regulation: the two-sided analytical framework transfers into competition-policy analysis of platforms, where the joint-analysis requirement — assess both sides together — has been formally adopted in major adjudications, because single-side analysis systematically misreads cross-subsidised pricing.
This sourceHolds that antitrust analysis of a two-sided transaction platform must assess both sides of the market together, adopting the joint-analysis requirement.
- The pattern ports further within its domain. Platform-competition analysis into regulation: the two-sided analytical framework transfers into competition-policy analysis of platforms, where the joint-analysis requirement — assess both sides together — has been formally adopted in major adjudications, because single-side analysis systematically misreads cross-subsidised pricing.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:acfbe181b1f8 · see in the full table