Which is more useful, the full can test or the empty can test, in detecting the torn supraspinatus tendon?¶
Itoi, E., Kido, Sano, Urayama, & Sato, K. (1999). Which is more useful, the full can test or the empty can test, in detecting the torn supraspinatus tendon?. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 27(1), 65-68.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Resisted Isometric Muscle Test
- The evidence for any particular maneuver belongs to its clinical question, tested population, and response criterion; in one comparison of empty- and full-can tests, accuracy changed depending on whether pain, weakness, or both counted as positive.
This sourceOriginal comparative clinical study; PubMed abstract consulted for methods, response criteria and study-specific results.
- The evidence for any particular maneuver belongs to its clinical question, tested population, and response criterion; in one comparison of empty- and full-can tests, accuracy changed depending on whether pain, weakness, or both counted as positive.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:adbdf891e19f · see in the full table