Unbiased Stereology¶
Howard, V., & Reed, M. (2005). Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy. BIOS Scientific Publishers.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Domain-Morphology Imaging
- It misleads most through unrepresentative sampling: a beautiful high-magnification image of one lucky spot can misstate the whole batch, and a 2D section routinely misjudges 3D connectivity, reporting isolated islands where a network threads above and below the plane.
This sourceExplains that unbiased stereology requires representative sampling and appropriate three-dimensional estimators because two-dimensional sections can misrepresent whole-specimen structure and connectivity.
- It misleads most through unrepresentative sampling: a beautiful high-magnification image of one lucky spot can misstate the whole batch, and a 2D section routinely misjudges 3D connectivity, reporting isolated islands where a network threads above and below the plane.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:aec0f5bafc0e · see in the full table