Dissent and the Supreme Court¶
Urofsky, M. I. (2015). Dissent and the Supreme Court: Its Role in the Court's History and the Nation's Constitutional Dialogue. Pantheon Books.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Dissent
- A registered dissenting opinion preserves the minority reasoning in a form that future advocates can cite when conditions change and the question returns — as happened repeatedly with Supreme Court dissents that became the foundation for later majority opinions overruling the earlier decision
This sourceA history of US Supreme Court dissent arguing that the great dissents of Harlan, Holmes and Brandeis preserved reasoning that later majorities adopted as doctrine.
SupportedVerified against the source
- A registered dissenting opinion preserves the minority reasoning in a form that future advocates can cite when conditions change and the question returns — as happened repeatedly with Supreme Court dissents that became the foundation for later majority opinions overruling the earlier decision
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:aed035ff6faf · see in the full table