Why People Obey the Law¶
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. Yale University Press.
Cited by¶
6 citations across 6 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Adjudication (Dispute Resolution)
- Cited in the text; the supporting sentence was not recorded.
- Impartiality
- What audit would detect a systematic offset?
This sourceEmpirically grounds procedural justice in identity-invariant decision-making: people accept outcomes as legitimate when the decision function visibly does not leak sensitivity to who they are, independent of whether the outcome favors them — the diagnostic question-set version of impartiality applied to institutional procedures.
- What audit would detect a systematic offset?
- Legitimacy
- Tyler (1990) characterized legitimacy as a belief-and-behavior attribute held by subjects toward an authority, measurable through compliance behavior (rule-following without enforcement), acceptance of adverse decisions (losing parties complying voluntarily), and public discourse (reference to the authority as "our" institution rather than "their" imposition).
This sourceEmpirically grounds procedural justice in identity-invariant decision-making: people accept outcomes as legitimate when the decision function visibly does not leak sensitivity to who they are, independent of whether the outcome favors them — the diagnostic question-set version of impartiality applied to institutional procedures.
- Tyler (1990) characterized legitimacy as a belief-and-behavior attribute held by subjects toward an authority, measurable through compliance behavior (rule-following without enforcement), acceptance of adverse decisions (losing parties complying voluntarily), and public discourse (reference to the authority as "our" institution rather than "their" imposition).
- Procedural Fairness (Due Process)
- Central elements are notice (affected parties know a decision is pending), opportunity to be heard (they can present evidence and argument), impartial decision-making (absence of bias and conflict of interest), and reasoned justification (explicit explanation of findings and legal conclusions), as Tyler (1990) documents in his foundational empirical study showing that perceived fairness of process drives compliance and acceptance independently of outcome favorability.
This sourceEmpirically grounds procedural justice in identity-invariant decision-making: people accept outcomes as legitimate when the decision function visibly does not leak sensitivity to who they are, independent of whether the outcome favors them — the diagnostic question-set version of impartiality applied to institutional procedures.
- Central elements are notice (affected parties know a decision is pending), opportunity to be heard (they can present evidence and argument), impartial decision-making (absence of bias and conflict of interest), and reasoned justification (explicit explanation of findings and legal conclusions), as Tyler (1990) documents in his foundational empirical study showing that perceived fairness of process drives compliance and acceptance independently of outcome favorability.
Mechanisms¶
- Conditional Release or Off-Ramp Protocol
- This is the logic of procedural justice: people comply with, and accept the legitimacy of, outcomes reached through a process they experience as fair and navigable.
This sourceFinds that fair, participatory procedures strengthen perceived legitimacy and voluntary compliance with legal outcomes.
- This is the logic of procedural justice: people comply with, and accept the legitimacy of, outcomes reached through a process they experience as fair and navigable.
- Governance Rule Review
- Documenting who benefits and preserving dissent is what makes the outcome defensible — it is the difference between a rule people merely comply with and one they accept, the core of procedural justice
This sourceDistinguishes externally compelled compliance from voluntary acceptance grounded in procedural justice and institutional legitimacy.
- Documenting who benefits and preserving dissent is what makes the outcome defensible — it is the difference between a rule people merely comply with and one they accept, the core of procedural justice
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.
- https://books.google.com/books/about/Why_People_Obey_the_Law.html?id=mq9VzgEACAAJ ×1
- https://search.worldcat.org/title/Why-people-obey-the-law/oclc/20132532 ×1
Registry ID ref:af96deb8ba3e · see in the full table