Plain Writing Act of 2010¶
United States Congress. (2010). Plain Writing Act of 2010.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Language Accessibility Review
- Its strength is catching exclusion that is invisible to expert reviewers — the gap between "linguistically correct" and "usable by this audience," anchored in plain-language and readability practice.
This sourceRequires clear, concise, well-organized language appropriate to the subject and intended audience rather than merely formally correct wording.
- Its strength is catching exclusion that is invisible to expert reviewers — the gap between "linguistically correct" and "usable by this audience," anchored in plain-language and readability practice.
- Plain-Language Translation
- The agency works under a plain-language mandate of the kind the U.S. Plain Writing Act established for federal communications.
This sourceThe cited work establishes Plain Writing Act established for federal communications.
- The agency works under a plain-language mandate of the kind the U.S. Plain Writing Act established for federal communications.
- Plain-Language Transparency Report
- The discipline that guards against this is a fidelity check against the source and the rule that the summary is published with the full record and links to it, never instead of it — the plainness is a door to the record, not a substitute for it.
This sourceIt is the legitimate practice this mechanism generalizes; the abuse it must avoid is using plainness to editorialize.
- The discipline that guards against this is a fidelity check against the source and the rule that the summary is published with the full record and links to it, never instead of it — the plainness is a door to the record, not a substitute for it.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:afbb006ba185 · see in the full table