Systematic Review of the Outcomes and Trade-offs of Ten Types of Decarbonization Policy Instruments.¶
Peñasco, C., Anadón, L. D., & Verdolini, E. (2021). Systematic Review of the Outcomes and Trade-offs of Ten Types of Decarbonization Policy Instruments. Nature Climate Change, 11, 257-265.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Span
- And the recognition that policy instruments have a span moved into climate-policy design, where carbon pricing alone has a smaller span than pricing plus standards plus R&D.
This sourceReviews ten decarbonization policy instruments (carbon pricing, performance/technical standards, adoption subsidies, R&D and government-procurement support, information) across seven outcomes and finds policy mixes outperform single instruments — carbon pricing alone reaches a smaller set of effects than pricing plus standards plus R&D, the policy-instrument span argument.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Abstract of a systematic review of ten policy instruments across seven outcomes; it does not state that carbon pricing alone spans less than pricing plus standards plus R&D.
“We develop and implement a framework to systematically review and synthesize the impact of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments on seven technical and socioeconomic outcomes. ... We discuss how these trade-offs can be reduced or transformed into co-benefits by designing research and development and government procurement, deployment policies, carbon pricing and trading.”
- And the recognition that policy instruments have a span moved into climate-policy design, where carbon pricing alone has a smaller span than pricing plus standards plus R&D.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:afdd355ca531 · see in the full table