Mistakes in Choice-Based Welfare Analysis¶
Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2007). Mistakes in Choice-Based Welfare Analysis. American Economic Review.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Reference-Point Dependence
- The structure stays silent on whether a case is a mistake, a defensible priority, or an exploitation.
This sourceArgues that classifying a response as a mistake rests on assumptions about well-being that observed choice alone cannot supply.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract backs the principle that choice-based welfare verdicts rest on assumptions about well-being that observed choice cannot supply, but it does not itself state the mistake / defensible-priority / exploitation classification.
“we explore some conceptual issues as to why and how one might use these new assumptions and approaches to supplement and modify the revealed-preference approach as it is conventionally conceived”
- The structure stays silent on whether a case is a mistake, a defensible priority, or an exploitation.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b074465b9f29 · see in the full table