Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning¶
Walton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- False Dilemma
- Rhetoric and politics — "you're either with us or against us," which hides neutrality, conditional support, alternative framings, and abstention.
This sourceCatalogs presumptive argumentation schemes and their critical questions, including the black-or-white / false-dilemma scheme treated as a misuse of presumptive inference, supporting the rhetoric-and-politics use.
- Rhetoric and politics — "you're either with us or against us," which hides neutrality, conditional support, alternative framings, and abstention.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b123914d5bc4 · see in the full table