The Myth of the Encoding–Retrieval Match¶
Nairne, J. S. (2002). The Myth of the Encoding–Retrieval Match. Memory, 10(5–6), 5-6.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Transfer-Appropriate Processing
- Retrieval cues must also discriminate the target from competitors; greater match can help, do nothing, or hurt when it also increases cue overload.
This sourceCritical review arguing that match alone is not a monotonic causal predictor and that retrieval-cue diagnosticity must be considered.
- Retrieval cues must also discriminate the target from competitors; greater match can help, do nothing, or hurt when it also increases cue overload.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b202c2ec9a60 · see in the full table