Answering the Skeptics¶
Andersen, T. G., & Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models Do Provide Accurate Forecasts. International Economic Review, 39(4), 885-905.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Aliasing
- The continuous source with an information rate is the true price process, which carries real high-frequency structure — sharp intraday rallies and flash crashes, with peak-to-trough swings of, say, 15% within a single day.
This sourceShows that coarse (daily) sampling — e.g., daily squared returns — is a noisy, information-poor measure of volatility, and that high-frequency intraday data are required to recover the latent volatility the daily aggregate hides; supports the daily-sampling-hides-intraday-structure case.
- The continuous source with an information rate is the true price process, which carries real high-frequency structure — sharp intraday rallies and flash crashes, with peak-to-trough swings of, say, 15% within a single day.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b202fdcd60f3 · see in the full table