How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies.¶
West, J. (2003). How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy, 7333(03), 1259-1285.
Cited by¶
6 citations across 6 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Decomposition
This sourceBibliography-only (tier C). OFF-TOPIC ORPHAN — recommend removal.
- Design for Lifecycle Adaptability
This source(Bibliography-only — uncited in body; platform-strategy contamination.)
- Interface
- In open ecosystems, interface control is contested and hard-won; in closed systems, it is unilateral, a strategic dynamic West (2003) analyzes in his study of how platform vendors balance proprietary control against open adoption.
This sourceAnalyzes the political economy of interface ownership: platform vendors balance appropriability (proprietary control) against adoption (openness), showing that interface control is a strategic and contested resource.
- In open ecosystems, interface control is contested and hard-won; in closed systems, it is unilateral, a strategic dynamic West (2003) analyzes in his study of how platform vendors balance proprietary control against open adoption.
- Platform Design
- A common failure is either ossifying the platform (compatibility at the cost of progress, platform becomes stale relative to competitors) or breaking compatibility too frequently (applications constantly break, ecosystem loses confidence in the platform)
This sourceAnalyzes the political economy of interface ownership: platform vendors balance appropriability (proprietary control) against adoption (openness), showing that interface control is a strategic and contested resource.
- A common failure is either ossifying the platform (compatibility at the cost of progress, platform becomes stale relative to competitors) or breaking compatibility too frequently (applications constantly break, ecosystem loses confidence in the platform)
- Specialization
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
- Substitutability
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b230ccf24374 · see in the full table