The limits of anchoring.¶
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(4), 223-242.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Anchoring
- Structural tension: Anchoring interacts with confirmation bias (anchor-consistent evidence receives more weight), framing (anchors embedded in frames have amplified effects), availability (high-salience anchors are more effective), and motivation (anchors aligned with interest especially resistant to correction).
This sourceMaps boundary conditions of anchoring, including how extreme anchors have proportionally smaller effects and how anchoring interacts with scale and other judgmental factors.
- Structural tension: Anchoring interacts with confirmation bias (anchor-consistent evidence receives more weight), framing (anchors embedded in frames have amplified effects), availability (high-salience anchors are more effective), and motivation (anchors aligned with interest especially resistant to correction).
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b288f7fca17c · see in the full table