Group versus individual performance¶
Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one?. Psychological Bulletin.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Assembly Bonus Effect
- Small-group decision-making and problem-solving — the home turf: Collins and Guetzkow's original eureka/intellective-task setting and Hill's review tradition, where a group on a demonstrably-correct-answer problem can solve faster and more reliably than its best member
This sourceThe review that organised the field's group-versus-individual comparisons - including the comparison against the most competent member - and found evidence of process gain as well as Steiner's process loss; the specific 'faster and more reliably than its best member' result is Laughlin's later experimental work, not this review's finding.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Small-group decision-making and problem-solving — the home turf: Collins and Guetzkow's original eureka/intellective-task setting and Hill's review tradition, where a group on a demonstrably-correct-answer problem can solve faster and more reliably than its best member
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b315e388e8c1 · see in the full table