Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears.

Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(5), 975-979.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1953

Volume

25

Issue

5

Pages

975-979

DOI

10.1121/1.1907229

DOI registrant

Acoustical Society of America

Link

https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229

Cited from

philosophy

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Signal Extraction
  • In sensory neuroscience, receptive fields extract spatial- or temporal-frequency components from input, and cocktail-party processing separates a target voice from background.

    This sourceOriginates the cocktail-party problem of separating a target voice from competing background.

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    Cherry's abstract describes listeners hearing two simultaneous speech signals — the paradigm behind the cocktail-party problem — but states no separation of a target voice, and says nothing about chirps, the Higgs peak, or receptive fields.

    “Two types of test are reported: (a) the behavior of a listener when presented with two speech signals simultaneously (statistical filtering problem) and (b) behavior when different speech signals are presented to his two ears.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Domain-specific

• Dichotic Listening
  • The controlled two-channel setup is the identity; any observed right-ear advantage or theory of filtering is a result or interpretation, not the method itself.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:b3609c74df2e · see in the full table