An infalling observer in AdS/CFT¶
Papadodimas, & Raju. (2013). An infalling observer in AdS/CFT. Journal of High Energy Physics.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Firewall Paradox
- Black-hole information program — sharpened a decades-old qualitative tension into a qubit-level contradiction with a numerical onset at the Page time, making the problem operational rather than philosophical. AdS/CFT and holography — firewall arguments constrain bulk reconstructions of horizon-crossing operators, motivating the state-dependent-operator proposals (Papadodimas–Raju) and the entanglement-wedge / quantum-extremal-surface program
This sourcePapadodimas and Raju's reconstruction of local bulk operators behind the horizon, presented as a way to preserve unitarity without firewalls.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“we reconstruct the local bulk operators measured by the observer along his trajectory outside the black hole”
- Black-hole information program — sharpened a decades-old qualitative tension into a qubit-level contradiction with a numerical onset at the Page time, making the problem operational rather than philosophical. AdS/CFT and holography — firewall arguments constrain bulk reconstructions of horizon-crossing operators, motivating the state-dependent-operator proposals (Papadodimas–Raju) and the entanglement-wedge / quantum-extremal-surface program
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b42d89c9a825 · see in the full table