Experiences of frontline healthcare workers and their views about support during COVID-19 and previous pandemics¶
Billings, J. (2021). Experiences of frontline healthcare workers and their views about support during COVID-19 and previous pandemics: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Thematic Analysis
- Across many published studies, researchers interviewed nurses and doctors about working through the crisis, then applied the six-phase procedure to code the transcripts and build themes — recurring patterns such as fear of infecting one's family, moral distress at rationing care, and exhaustion from constantly changing protocols
This sourceSystematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of 46 studies of frontline healthcare workers' pandemic experiences, deriving eight themes that largely transcended time and geography.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“This review identified 46 qualitative studies which explored healthcare workers' experiences and views from pandemics or epidemics including and prior to COVID-19. Meta-synthesis derived eight key themes which largely transcended temporal and geographical boundaries.”
- Across many published studies, researchers interviewed nurses and doctors about working through the crisis, then applied the six-phase procedure to code the transcripts and build themes — recurring patterns such as fear of infecting one's family, moral distress at rationing care, and exhaustion from constantly changing protocols
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b44b396744a4 · see in the full table