Superspreading and the Effect of Individual Variation on Disease Emergence¶
Lloyd-Smith, J. O., Schreiber, S. J., Kopp, P. E., & Getz, W. M. (2005). Superspreading and the Effect of Individual Variation on Disease Emergence. Nature, 438(7066), 355-359.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Concentration
- In epidemiology, transmission concentrates: superspreading events and overdispersed transmission mean a small fraction of cases drive most infections
This sourceShows transmission is overdispersed — a small fraction of cases drive most infections (superspreading) — so the epidemic's force concentrates at a few decisive points, with control implications for targeted measures.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Lloyd-Smith and colleagues measure individual infectiousness across ten outbreak or surveillance datasets and plot the "Proportion of transmission expected from the most infectious 20% of cases" against a 20/80 reference curve, finding distributions that are highly overdispersed. In Singapore most SARS cases were barely infectious while a small proportion were highly infectious. That concentration of transmission in a few cases is what the sentence asserts. The work does not reduce the pattern to a single universal fraction or cover every transmission setting, so the sentence's general phrasing is broader than any one estimate it gives.
“the great majority of SARS cases in Singapore were barely infectious (73% had ν < 1) but a small proportion were highly infectious (6% had ν > 8)”
- In epidemiology, transmission concentrates: superspreading events and overdispersed transmission mean a small fraction of cases drive most infections
Mechanisms¶
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b461f0aacf75 · see in the full table