Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment¶
Hauschild, M. Z., Goedkoop, Guinée, Heijungs, Huijbregts, Jolliet, Margni, et al. (2013). Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. 18(3), 683-697.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
- LCA naming supports the professional infrastructure that makes rigorous analysis feasible: ISO standards (14040/14044) establishing methodology, peer-review requirements for comparative claims, software tools (SimaPro, GaBi, OpenLCA) providing computational structure, industry-average databases (ecoinvent, USDA, BUWAL) reducing data-collection burden, and third-party certification bodies ensuring conformance, with the characterization-modeling layer itself the subject of best-practice consolidation by Hauschild, Goedkoop, Guinée et al. (2013).
This sourceConsolidates recommended characterization factors across midpoint impact categories, supplying the quantitative infrastructure that distinguishes LCA from qualitative environmental impression.
- LCA naming supports the professional infrastructure that makes rigorous analysis feasible: ISO standards (14040/14044) establishing methodology, peer-review requirements for comparative claims, software tools (SimaPro, GaBi, OpenLCA) providing computational structure, industry-average databases (ecoinvent, USDA, BUWAL) reducing data-collection burden, and third-party certification bodies ensuring conformance, with the characterization-modeling layer itself the subject of best-practice consolidation by Hauschild, Goedkoop, Guinée et al. (2013).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b4c67cffa9d3 · see in the full table