Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment¶
Hauschild, M. Z., Goedkoop, Guinée, Heijungs, Huijbregts, Jolliet, Margni, et al. (2013). Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. 18(3), 683-697.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
- LCA naming supports the professional infrastructure that makes rigorous analysis feasible: ISO standards (14040/14044) establishing methodology, peer-review requirements for comparative claims, software tools (SimaPro, GaBi, OpenLCA) providing computational structure, industry-average databases (ecoinvent, USDA, BUWAL) reducing data-collection burden, and third-party certification bodies ensuring conformance, with the characterization-modeling layer itself the subject of best-practice consolidation by Hauschild, Goedkoop, Guinée et al. (2013).
This sourceConsolidates recommended characterization factors across midpoint impact categories, supplying the quantitative infrastructure that distinguishes LCA from qualitative environmental impression.
- LCA naming supports the professional infrastructure that makes rigorous analysis feasible: ISO standards (14040/14044) establishing methodology, peer-review requirements for comparative claims, software tools (SimaPro, GaBi, OpenLCA) providing computational structure, industry-average databases (ecoinvent, USDA, BUWAL) reducing data-collection burden, and third-party certification bodies ensuring conformance, with the characterization-modeling layer itself the subject of best-practice consolidation by Hauschild, Goedkoop, Guinée et al. (2013).
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b4c67cffa9d3 · see in the full table