Interferences in Immunoassay¶
Tate, J., & Ward, G. (2004). Interferences in Immunoassay. 25(2), 105-120.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Paradox of Unanimity
- In medical diagnostic panels, perfect agreement among supposedly independent tests prompts an update partly toward "the tests share a cross-reaction or sample-handling pathway."
This sourceDocuments that supposedly independent immunoassays can share cross-reacting substances and common interference/sample-handling pathways, so concordant results across panel tests can reflect a shared analytical confound rather than independent confirmation.
- In medical diagnostic panels, perfect agreement among supposedly independent tests prompts an update partly toward "the tests share a cross-reaction or sample-handling pathway."
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b5cb1ea0f7f5 · see in the full table