Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19¶
Emanuel, E. J., Persad, Upshur, Thome, Parker, Glickman, Zhang, et al. (2020). Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(21), 2049-2055.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Sequencing
- Medicine & surgery: Operative sequencing (order of surgical steps respecting anatomical access and blood flow), medical sequencing (diagnostic tests ordered to rule out high-impact conditions efficiently), vaccination sequencing (which populations first, balancing disease burden and logistics), as Emanuel et al. (2020) frame in their NEJM analysis of how priority orderings of scarce medical resources reflect explicit ethical and operational sequencing choices.
This sourceArticulates four ethical values (maximize benefits, treat people equally, promote and reward instrumental value, give priority to the worst off) and six recommendations for commensuring competing patient claims in pandemic triage; canonical reference for the embedded value choices in medical-resource allocation protocols.
- Medicine & surgery: Operative sequencing (order of surgical steps respecting anatomical access and blood flow), medical sequencing (diagnostic tests ordered to rule out high-impact conditions efficiently), vaccination sequencing (which populations first, balancing disease burden and logistics), as Emanuel et al. (2020) frame in their NEJM analysis of how priority orderings of scarce medical resources reflect explicit ethical and operational sequencing choices.
- Value Commensuration
- The controversy revealed that stakeholders had fundamentally different views about what commensuration framework was legitimate, and no amount of technical refinement could resolve the underlying value disagreement.
This sourceArticulates four ethical values (maximize benefits, treat people equally, promote and reward instrumental value, give priority to the worst off) and six recommendations for commensuring competing patient claims in pandemic triage; canonical reference for the embedded value choices in medical-resource allocation protocols.
- The controversy revealed that stakeholders had fundamentally different views about what commensuration framework was legitimate, and no amount of technical refinement could resolve the underlying value disagreement.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b5d50bc6cafe · see in the full table