The Streisand Effect and Censorship Backfire¶
Jansen, S. C., & Martin, B. (2015). The Streisand Effect and Censorship Backfire. International Journal of Communication, 9, 656-671.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Streisand Effect
- In censorship and content moderation, takedown orders, platform deletions, and bans regularly amplify the targeted content: the attempt becomes a news story, the content is archived and re-uploaded, and final reach exceeds the pre-action baseline.
This sourceAnalyzes how visible attempts to censor or suppress information (takedowns, lawsuits, bans) backfire by attracting attention and propagation, the canonical scholarly treatment of the effect and its preconditions.
- In censorship and content moderation, takedown orders, platform deletions, and bans regularly amplify the targeted content: the attempt becomes a news story, the content is archived and re-uploaded, and final reach exceeds the pre-action baseline.
Mechanisms¶
- Bloom Harvest or Suppression Intervention
- Done carelessly, suppression can backfire by drawing attention to the very thing it hides — the Streisand effect.
This sourceDefines the Streisand effect as suppression that unintentionally draws greater attention to the targeted information.
- Done carelessly, suppression can backfire by drawing attention to the very thing it hides — the Streisand effect.
- Managed Discourse Retreat Plan
- Its failure mode is the Streisand effect: a clumsy or over-loud retreat can call more attention to the position it means to bury, normalizing it further through the very act of withdrawal.
This sourceDefines the Streisand effect as a censorship or suppression attempt that backfires by producing substantially more attention.
- Its failure mode is the Streisand effect: a clumsy or over-loud retreat can call more attention to the position it means to bury, normalizing it further through the very act of withdrawal.
- Mirror and Search Spike Dashboard
- Vanity or misread metrics: treating a search blip among already-hostile accounts as a five-alarm cascade, and over-reacting into the very spectacle the archetype warns against.
This sourceShows how an attempt to suppress online information can backfire by increasing attention to it.
- Vanity or misread metrics: treating a search blip among already-hostile accounts as a five-alarm cascade, and over-reacting into the very spectacle the archetype warns against.
- Misquote Response Protocol
- Its central failure mode is the Streisand effect — that the act of responding to an obscure distortion can amplify it, drawing far more attention to the misframe than it would ever have earned on its own.
This sourceDocuments the Streisand effect, in which responding to an obscure distortion can amplify the attention it receives.
- Its central failure mode is the Streisand effect — that the act of responding to an obscure distortion can amplify it, drawing far more attention to the misframe than it would ever have earned on its own.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b5e5555508e0 · see in the full table