In Google We Trust¶
Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position, and Relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801-823.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Salience-as-Significance
- Management dashboards. What the executive dashboard surfaces is read as what the firm prioritises, so KPI selection becomes de facto strategy regardless of designer intent. Search and recommendation. Rank position read as authority or consensus, when the ranking optimises click-through or dwell time — with whole industries built to exploit the reading.
This sourceDemonstrates users read search rank position as authority/relevance, trusting top results beyond their actual quality.
- Management dashboards. What the executive dashboard surfaces is read as what the firm prioritises, so KPI selection becomes de facto strategy regardless of designer intent. Search and recommendation. Rank position read as authority or consensus, when the ranking optimises click-through or dwell time — with whole industries built to exploit the reading.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:b5ebb96814c9 · see in the full table